1 頁 (共 1 頁)

請問有關耳塞式耳機2

文章發表於 : 週四 11月 07, 2002 2:55 am
ANOTH
不好意思....我問怎麼看一些功能指標的原因是因為我前天去買了個低檔便宜的
耳機∼∼可是回來聽一下才發現∼∼聽起來的音質實在有夠爛的∼由於大部分低價位的耳機不能先試聽∼所以我才想問能不能夠從他所標示的一些例如頻率或功率的數字就可以看出聽起來的效果好不好∼減低買回去才在後悔的機會..(指低檔的...中高價位的我實在買不起..><窮..).....

還有我說的低中高檔耳機的值指的是他的一些功能數據值∼而不是價值∼
好像有一些大大誤會了......不好意思...

選購耳機時功能上該參考哪些指標呢?
看到一堆名詞.....
驅動單體(mm)
阻抗(Ω)
正常功率(mW)
最大功率(mW)
響應頻率(Hz)
感度(dB)
這些名詞在耳機上是做什麼用的呢?
如何看這些值找到音感佳聽起來舒適的耳機呢
低中高檔耳機的值大約各是多少呢?
麻煩各位大大知道的幫忙說明一下
謝謝.......
:cry::aa:

文章發表於 : 週四 11月 07, 2002 3:05 am
ANOTH
:aa::cry:
還是挑低價位的耳機都要跟別人借來聽或實際自己買來聽了以後才能知道到底聽起來好不好∼而沒有辦法從他給的一些數字去判斷聽起來大概會是是怎麼樣∼∼
真的沒辦法嗎....或許聽起來的感覺跟那個是一點關係都沒有的∼是嗎??
感謝

文章發表於 : 週四 11月 07, 2002 11:58 am
RogerShih
不管低價或是高價耳機, 規格是客觀標準, 聽感是主觀因素, 規格好的聲音不見得就是自己要的.


--
AKG迷, 收藏 K400、K500、K301、K501、K1000, 再來支 K240DF 吧:cry:

文章發表於 : 週一 11月 25, 2002 4:29 pm
lycsc
不好意思....我問怎麼看一些功能指標的原因是因為我前天去買了個低檔便宜的
耳機∼∼可是回來聽一下才發現∼∼聽起來的音質實在有夠爛的∼由於大部分低價位的耳機不能先試聽∼所以我才想問能不能夠從他所標示的一些例如頻率或功率的數字就可以看出聽起來的效果好不好∼減低買回去才在後悔的機會..(指低檔的...中高價位的我實在買不起..><窮..).....

還有我說的低中高檔耳機的值指的是他的一些功能數據值∼而不是價值∼
好像有一些大大誤會了......不好意思...

選購耳機時功能上該參考哪些指標呢?
看到一堆名詞.....
驅動單體(mm)
阻抗(Ω)
正常功率(mW)
最大功率(mW)
響應頻率(Hz)
感度(dB)
這些名詞在耳機上是做什麼用的呢?
如何看這些值找到音感佳聽起來舒適的耳機呢
低中高檔耳機的值大約各是多少呢?
麻煩各位大大知道的幫忙說明一下
謝謝.......
:cry::aa:


贵点总要好点。

文章發表於 : 週一 11月 25, 2002 5:00 pm
Jeff
一些廉價雜牌的耳機的規格都僅供看"爽"~~
實質上一點意義也沒有~~
:aa::aa::aa:

Do It Yourself

文章發表於 : 週一 11月 25, 2002 6:12 pm
beatmania
實在借不到
又不能試聽的話
只好上網看口碑嚕~

我還是比較認同RogerShih前輩的看法
聽是主觀因素
規格只是客觀因素

:aiya:

文章發表於 : 週一 11月 25, 2002 6:26 pm
allenmu318
靠網友或朋友使用過的推薦是比較好且風險小.

文章發表於 : 週一 11月 25, 2002 10:54 pm
yall
ER6跟STAX SR-001比起來不知道誰會比較好呢.?:grin::grin:

文章發表於 : 週一 11月 25, 2002 11:02 pm
小蔡
ER6跟STAX SR-001比起來不知道誰會比較好呢.?:grin::grin:

ER6

:D:D:D

-----------------------
:bow:[color=teal]是非兩面看 : 困難似金錢:bow:

:bow:工作是表現 : 偷學古聖賢:bow:</font

文章發表於 : 週一 11月 25, 2002 11:05 pm
Bagheera
It sounds like you are looking for ear-plugs around ~NT $100 - $500, right? Ok.

The AIWA ear-plugs at around NT $120 is a good buy; the bass is pretty good, and the mid-range is quite warm. Treble.... err, detail is somewhat lacking. But NT $120, what can you say???

As for your question with regard to the specs:

-驅動單體(mm): This refers to the size (diameter) of the headphone drivers. Usually, the bigger the 驅動單體, the better (as a rule, bigger drivers give deeper bass)

-阻抗(Ω): The lower the better. This refers to the resistance the electricity must overcome to travel through the 驅動單體. As you expect, the lower the resistance, the stronger the sisgnal, and the louder a headphone will sound at a given power level.

-正常功率(mW): This is the constant amount of electricity the headphone must consume to remain active. If the headphone doesn't receive as much power as the specified 正常功率, it will be underpowered and the sound quality would be terrible. Headphones with a lower 正常功率 will be easier to drive, and in the case of most ear-plugs this number doesn't matter much, since any CD player can drive a pair of ear-plugs without problem. However, when you use audiophile-quality headphone, you will want a good amplifier to provide enough power.

-最大功率(mW): This is the highest level of power the headphone can accept. Usually, the higher the better, because this kind of determines the level of loudness a headphone can achieve. if the headphone receives a power greater than that of 最大功率, it may become damaged. As you can imagine, headphones with a low 最大功率 cannot go as loud as those with high 最大功率; but in most cases this does not matter because your ears will likely be hurt long before you can push your headphones to its 最大功率.

-響應頻率(Hz): This is the frequencies at which the headphones will produce sounds of. The wider the range of frequencies, the better. The 響應頻率 of a CD is 20hz-20000hz, so a good headphone would usually have 響應頻率 around that (for example, the AIWA earplugs I told you about has 響應頻率 of 16hz-20000hz). My ATH-A9X can go from 5hz-30000hz, but of course, you don't need all that for listening to CDs.

-感度(dB): This refers to the level of loudness a headphone will achieve at a given power level. A headphone with 107db/mW 感度 will sound louder than a headphone with 98db/mW at the same power level.

--------------------
"Every wise child in this world is sad and depressed."

文章發表於 : 週二 11月 26, 2002 11:11 am
lycsc
由于耳机发展较为缓慢,对于无法试听又对音质要求较高的朋友,购买成熟的和中性声音的耳机,是比较理想的选择!

文章發表於 : 週二 11月 26, 2002 3:14 pm
yall
ER6跟STAX SR-001比起來不知道誰會比較好呢.?:grin::grin:

ER6




這真是太神奇了!!:cold::mad::mad:
ER6居然可以尬的過靜電耳機:haha::haha:

文章發表於 : 週二 11月 26, 2002 10:30 pm
beatmania
ER6跟STAX SR-001比起來不知道誰會比較好呢.?:grin::grin:

ER6




這真是太神奇了!!:cold::mad::mad:
ER6居然可以尬的過靜電耳機:haha::haha:


SR-001.....
run約300小時還沒全開~~哎~~~~
被別人幹掉也是應該的~
:haha:

文章發表於 : 週二 11月 26, 2002 10:55 pm
Bagheera
由于耳机发展较为缓慢,对于无法试听又对音质要求较高的朋友,购买成熟的和中性声音的耳机,是比较理想的选择!


Ah, yeah sorry my mistake.

Headphones with 阻抗 is just harder to "push", therefore requires more power. This doesn't mean they are bad; some of the best headphones require a lot of power because of high 阻抗 but they have great sound quality.

But in your case, I think it would be best to find a headphone with low 阻抗. It sounds like you just want a pair of earplugs for portable CD-Player or something, right? Those don't provide much power, so you will be better off with a headphone of low 阻抗.

--------------------
"Every wise child in this world is sad and depressed."

文章發表於 : 週一 12月 09, 2002 2:05 am
yall
beatmania 寫:
ER6跟STAX SR-001比起來不知道誰會比較好呢.?:grin::grin:

ER6




這真是太神奇了!!:cold::mad::mad:
ER6居然可以尬的過靜電耳機:haha::haha:


SR-001.....
run約300小時還沒全開~~哎~~~~
被別人幹掉也是應該的~
:haha:


這位大大....sr001我想買ㄝ..音質真的好嗎?
因為想玩玩靜電耳機,故找台入門的來試試 :ho:
給點意見吧 :bs: